January 10 : In a bid to finance combating non-communicable diseases, and reduce consumption of harmful products such as tobacco and alcohol, the government may consider action on a plan document for the 12th five-year plan  recommending imposing sin tax on cigarettes and  alcohol but it would be sinful to impose such tax on low alcohol products like wine and beer, asserts Subhash Arora  
                     The recommended 12th plan document will be submitted to the National Development Council (NDC) presided over  by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 27 December. It proposes to impose a sin tax on cigarettes  and alcohol products not only to decrease the consumption of these harmful  substances but also purports to help finance a part of the health budget during the  12th five-year plan (2012-2017).  
                        
                       Wikipedia defines ‘sin tax’ as ‘a kind of sumptuary tax: a tax specifically levied  on certain generally socially proscribed goods and services, for example alcohol and tobacco, candies, soft drinks, fast foods, coffee, and  gambling. Common targets of sumptuary taxes are alcohol and tobacco, gambling,  and vehicles emitting excessive pollutants. Sumptuary tax on sugar and soft drinks has also been suggested.’  
                     Investopedia explains further that ‘State governments favour sin  taxes because they generate  an enormous amount of revenue and are usually easily accepted by the general  public because they are indirect taxes that only affect those who use the  products. When individual states run deficits, the sin tax is typically one of  the first taxes recommended by lawmakers to help fill the budget gap.’  
                     It  may be naïve to challenge the sin tax on cigarettes although it is the poorer  section that is hooked to the harmful habit who will  be affected the most. It is well established that smokers find it impossible to  kick the habit once formed. I don’t hold cudgels for the hard liquor industry  (they have their own strong lobby) but it would make sense to leave wine out of  the ambit of this proposed tax in an attempt to encourage people to switch to  the low-alcohol product like wine just as China has done with relative success.  Beer could also fall in this low-alcohol category but much higher revenues  generated by the industry may be too tempting to ignore. 
                     One  hopes that wine will be kept out of the ambit not only because of the  increasing number of independent studies that reinforce  the positive effects of regular consumption of 1-2 glasses of red wine a  day-the latest such study came from Hong Kong last week, indicating that the red  wine compounds are anti-aging. The industry is in a state of infancy and the  revenues generated would be measly compared to hard liquor and beer sharing  over 400 million cases of space enjoyed by about 62 million drinkers. In fact,  I would urge the government to consider allowing voluntary printing of the  message on the label of each bottle of wine, ‘Two glasses a day may be  beneficial but more will be hazardous for health!)  
                     The  plan document could also consider such tax on aerated soft drinks, fast foods.  There have already been  demands and suggestions from many quarters  that the government should legalize betting and collect millions of dollars  from the taxes generated due to gambling which is rampant in any case. 
                     Although the exact contents of the draft document are not  known, the article does point towards the cigarette industry as the major  target. ‘The document for NDC says a package of policy interventions would be  taken up which includes raising taxes on tobacco, enforcing ban on tobacco  advertising in electronic media, counseling for quitting tobacco, early  detection and effective control of high blood pressure and diabetes, screening for common and  treatable cancers and salt reduction in processed foods’ suggesting that the  focus may be on the tobacco products. 
                     According to the article,  around 275 million Indians consume tobacco. Around 2,500 people die every day due  to tobacco related diseases in India. Alcohol consumption causes 25% of road  accidents though there are no statistics that differentiate between beer, wine  and hard liquor  causing such accidents-one  has not heard of any accident caused by heavy drinking of beer or wine though  it cannot be ruled out.  
                      In  the meantime, TOI continues to show its ignorance and prejudice towards wine.  In the article published on Saturday, the  graphic in the center of the two-column article shows a glass of red  wine with a tag reading TAX rather than a more apt picture of someone dying of  cancer due to smoking cigarettes or a vino in  the gutter with a glass of whisky and a bottle clutched under  his arm. I think  it is high time  their editorial  department looks at articles on wine with the care  that needs to be accorded to fine wine.  |